Home > Xp Home > XP Home Cluster Size

XP Home Cluster Size

When you install Windows XP as an upgrade of a previous version of Windows running FAT16 or FAT32 and convert to NTFS as part of setup or after the fact, in All rights reserved. The DOS-based software tools some PC makers use to image new hard drives are the culprit. Performance is sluggish. navigate here

I explained about cluster sizes in NTFS in the first in the series: http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/19.htm#filesys In short, Windows XP's NTFS file system is even more storage efficient than Win98's FAT32. It's also not warning people not to convert to NTFS on Windows 9x upgrades, which routinely result in 512-byte cluster sizes. This isn't just a Windows XP problem, either. Maybe you'll be lucky and have the fast-track conversion.

The first is during installation, where you'll be asked both what partition you want to install to and whether you want to format that drive with NTFS or use the existing Jeff confirms that Partition Commander can't covert NTFS cluster sizes in it current version either. It's also more reliable. From the program menu, choose Partition >Modify >Change cluster size.

Finally, there are other disk partitioning utilities -- some of them available for free -- that may also do the job. Don't Answer it Armed Latest: KB, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:32 AM Politics and News Maddow just tweeted she has Trumps tax returns Latest: SNC, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:31 AM Microsoft's David Golds sent word that the NTFS article in the last issue was accurate except on one point. Namaste, Peace & Love,GlennIf I have frustrated you, then I must be a student.

NTSF Cluster Size 12. The problem lies in the "cluster size" set for the NTFS partition. Show Ignored Content As Seen On Welcome to Tech Support Guy! But I wanted to let you know they existed if you want to do your own research.

Join Now For immediate help use Live now! HERE IS THE ARTICLE: ThSolution for Windows XP NTFS Slowdowns A few people have written to me about problems they've had with big slowdowns in their Windows XP systems after converting The biggest issue seems to be that NTFS and NT in general limits the lowest file size to 1024 bytes. So can PartitionMagic convert the cluster size to 4K for him?

My take though? Cluster size in unattended disk format??? 13. No, create an account now. My take though?

I hope to get some sort of report back from Microsoft -- and if so, I'll publish it in a future issue. check over here If I've imparted information or a skill to you, then I must be a teacher. You can buy it on the Internet for about $40. Finally, there are other disk partitioning utilities -- some of them available for free -- that may also do the job.

This is more true under Windows 2000, where due to the conversion process, the resulting NTFS cluster sizes, Gold says, are reduced to 512bytes, or one-half K. The DOS-based software tools some PC makers use to image new hard drives are the culprit. If I get that, I will try it and write about it in a future issue. his comment is here The first is the system partition and it is 14 Gb and formated NTFS with default options (auto cluster size).

Throughput improvements on a stripe level off when the cluster size equals the size of the stripe size. The company is working with some of SFNL's readers on that point. Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

To prove the point, I acquired a copy of Paragon Partition Manager 5.0 from the company and configured a test system.

It is also able to convert from FAT/FAT32 to NTFS and back. So if you've got a new Windows XP box that runs slow, you should definitely check out what I'm about to explain. If I get that, I will try it and write about it in a future issue. Log in or Sign up Tech Support Guy Home Forums > Operating Systems > Windows XP > Computer problem?

Next I used Windows' Disk Defragmenter to check the cluster size on my hard disk. Back to top #7 Platypus Platypus Moderator 8,795 posts OFFLINE Gender:Male Location:Australia Local time:12:35 AM Posted 04 May 2012 - 06:02 AM Yes, you're contemplating "slack space", the inevitable unused Back to top #5 RevGAM RevGAM Topic Starter Members 677 posts OFFLINE Gender:Male Location:Central Java, Indonesia Local time:08:35 PM Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:35 AM No, I don't have weblink Also, am I setting myself up for problems later on by not using the default cluster size?

On a 2GHz Pentium 4 machine, it took over a day to complete the conversion on a 30 GB hard disk. If I've helped you, then I must be a volunteer. It's just that 512-byte clusters are a bit small. The company is working with some of SFNL's readers on that point.

Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. I have not tested those products. Username Forum Password I've forgotten my password Remember me This is not recommended for shared computers Sign in anonymously Don't add me to the active users list Privacy Policy

MenuExperts Windows Policies? 3.

I'll tell you upfront that there are two problems with this product. AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals Home Forums > Hardware and Technology > Computer Help > Jump to content Sign In Create Account Search Advanced Search section: This topic