Home > Windows Xp > Can Windows Xp Support Quad Core Processors

Can Windows Xp Support Quad Core Processors


Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue.View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. But it seems you've got that part figured out since I noticed your thread in Other Hardware. chery-o Michael says: February 2, 2008 at 3:04 am Cheers for that, settled a debate i had with a mate in about 30 seconds by finding your page in the first Also if you install XP after Vista, Vista will not boot up. his comment is here

Your cache administrator is webmaster. OliverGowland replied Mar 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM Loading... My question is what are the drawbacks of running the 32-bit version of Windows XP on dual quad-core Xeon processors? Alexandre says: November 29, 2007 at 9:36 am I actually have Vista Ultimate on my Q6600 (quadcore) PC.

Can Windows Xp Support Quad Core Processors

Which is good news for us consumers, since a dual core system is cheaper. 🙂 [tags]microsoft, windows, xp, dual,quad, core, processor, [/tags]Related Written by Ron SchenoneI have been writing for Lockergnome Hat Monster "Armed and Hammered" Ars Legatus Legionis Tribus: Yorkshire (it's grim oop north) Registered: Jan 21, 2001Posts: 43378 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:40 pm 1. Peter says: March 19, 2008 at 10:09 am thats great, thanks for the info. Scared of money being "locked away" in retirement accounts What would you call a person who is obsessed with being "normal"?

e6400(discontinued)getting it from a friend for $75 hes upgrading and its only been used for 30+ hours, and i can rely on him « New built computer wont boot. | Vista does get the per-CPU-ready queue structure introduced with Server 2003. share|improve this answer answered Apr 25 '13 at 4:58 TechMedicNYC 31837 I'm curious, how exactly does this work? Windows Xp Cpu If you are not going to be doing this, then there is no reason to install Professional.

Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics Copyright © 2017 University of Washington Last Modified: 10 Nov 2010 1:51:38 UTC Back to top ^ Seriously, no offence Ron, but i think you're leaving out some vital information. share|improve this answer edited Aug 28 '11 at 4:45 Gareth 13.2k114158 answered Dec 18 '09 at 15:31 harrymc 197k7178432 It's unchecked, and checking it does show 2 CPUs. Not *any* but an overwhelming majority.

XP's scheduler is essentially the same as that in Windows 2000, which in server editions scaled very well to far more than eight CPUs. Processors implementing AMD's 64 bit architecture have full support for Intel's 32 bit architecture. i mean not losing lots of resources? lawrencelaw Seniorius Lurkius Registered: Mar 17, 2009Posts: 5 Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:37 am guys,My son Ethan says hi again...he sleeps late!

Does Windows Xp Support Dual Core Processors

In that case, XP-64 with XP-32 in a VM may prove superior.2. That shouldn't be a problem unless it's 16-bit.quote:My question is what are the drawbacks of running the 32-bit version of Windows XP on dual quad-core Xeon processors? Can Windows Xp Support Quad Core Processors Ron Schenone says: November 23, 2007 at 6:00 am Hi Spellman, All the best with your quad. Windows Xp Processor Requirements Rabid Squirrel Wise, Aged Ars Veteran Registered: May 8, 2008Posts: 148 Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:16 am Help!

LG 32LA620V Freezing. this content RAID0 - Help!!!!! thus 64-bit. I remember a long time ago that XP *Pro* supported 2 physical chips and I believe that was it...if you wanted more than 2 *physical* chips, you needed to dump XP Windows Xp 64 Bit Processor Support

You are more likely to have your thread read if it's new though, simply because some people might gloss over threads they'd already seen.As far as a thread's topic matching the Just copy it to boot.ini.orig or something similar. Is this a famous aviator / airplane? weblink And increasingly that yes is more relevent in the future... 08-30-2008, 11:18 AM #12 Zombeast Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Moreno Valley, CA Posts: 364

What does adding /kernel=ntkrnlmp.exe /hal=halmacpi.dll do to force it to show all of the CPU cores? I have Intel quad core i7 will it be able to see all the cores and use them? On the intel side it may not matter at all since the cache size per 2 cores can be made the same and there is still one MCH per two sockets.Id

There are work arounds to this.Read hear:http://www.pronetworks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=607987And a BCEDIT program here:http://www.vistabootpro.org/I'd do a Google and make sure you completely understand the risks of trying this.

If you want great performance for XP, don't exceed 4 GB and limit yourself to a single quad core or dual core. In any case, I have several XP Home machines with quad core chips running all 4 cores. ____________ Dublin, CA SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat ID: But I don't want to get a quad-core if all 4 cores will not be utilized. I highly doubt that's the case for CFD.quote:then you might as well go all the way and go for the OS that is best designed for multi-threaded applications, Vista.

that is the reason ppl buy the 6600 or higher, becuase the average dual-core you would get in a crappy dell computer would be under 2 ghz. Rabid Squirrel Wise, Aged Ars Veteran Registered: May 8, 2008Posts: 148 Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:25 pm If you look at benchmarks of 8 or more cores in Windows Vista, We are working to restore service. http://comvurgent.com/windows-xp/mcafee-windows-xp-support.html Will Windows XP Pro and Home support multi-core processors such as Dual or Quad core?

Gotta love getting money back for recycling used cartridges and other products.Comments are closed. Regards, Ron Guia Richmond says: April 15, 2007 at 12:53 am Thank you for the info!At least I know that I can use the QX6700 to its full extent on XP A 32 bit kernel mode component (typically a driver) cannot be loaded in 64 bit Windows.WOW64 is a much better abstraction layer than WOW32 ever was.* Including an entire range of cheers brandon t says: April 14, 2008 at 10:21 am You all have been slightly mislead by what Ron said.

It still doesn't make a bit of sense.